My daughter has a
new book about baby dinosaurs in which
nearly every dinosaur has feathers. It includes a surprising fact about oviraptors.
"In 1923," writes author Lita Judge, "a new species of dinosaur was found lying on top of a nest. At first scientists thought the dinosaur had died while raiding the nest — it had a huge, toothless beak that looked perfect for eating eggs. They named it Oviraptor, which means 'Egg Thief.'"
Sasha knows about Oviraptors. Any book that goes beyond the Triceratops/T-rex/Brachiosaurus triumvirate will include information about the Oviraptor, since it was discovered so long ago, paleontologically speaking. They're one of the more frightening dinosaurs for a girl who so dearly loves babies. They stand in stark contrast to the Maiasaura, whose name means "Good Mother Lizard" and who is noted for actually looking after her babies. (Most dinosaurs, they say, were like turtles: they laid their eggs and then left.)
But lo. When paleontologists studied the embryos inside the eggs beside Oviraptor's fossilized remains, they realized that Oviraptors were not thieves. They were sitting on their own nests.
Says Lita Judge, "Though he couldn't fly, a father Oviraptor might have spread his feathers over his fragile babies to keep them cool in the searing desert sun while mother brought meat for their next meal. He may also have used his feathers to keep his babies warm at night."
I don't particularly like dinosaurs, but I do enjoy the history of dinosaur discoveries. I find it so interesting that dinosaur books for children include caveats, phrases like "scientists used to believe" or "scientists now think..." They are sprinkled with words like "maybe" and "perhaps."
When a child grows up with books like these, how do they affect her worldview? Will she come to believe that knowledge is provisional, that truths are only temporary, that it's her choice to either "believe" or "not believe" what a scientist tells her?
*************
Ursula Le Guin has said, "History is one way of telling stories, just like myth, fiction, or oral storytelling. But over the last hundred years, history has pre-emptied the other forms of storytelling because of its claim to absolute, objective truth. Trying to be scientists, historians stood outside of history and told the story of how it was. All that has changed radically over the last twenty years. Historians now laugh at the pretence of objective truth. They agree that every age has its own history, and if there is any objective truth, we can't reach it with words. History is not a science, it's an art."**
My daughter's dinosaur books make me think that science is not a science, but an art.
*"Born To Be Giants: How Baby Dinosaurs Grew To Rule the World." Copyright 2010 by Lita Judge. The illustrations in this book are gorgeous.
**I found this quote
here, where it was excepted from "Talking on the Water; Conversations About Nature and Creativity", copyright 1994 by Jonathan White.